Semi-norms and symmetric bilinear forms

Let V be a real vector space and \cdot : V^2 \to \mathbb{R} a symmetric bilinear form. In this post I will first show that Cauchy-Schwarz inequality is equivalent to \cdot being semi-definite. I will then show that for a non-negative positive-homogeneous function f : V \to \mathbb{R} the triangle inequality, convexity, and quasi-convexity are all equivalent. Finally, I will show that if  |\cdot|: V \to \mathbb{R} : |x| = \sqrt{|x \cdot x|}, then |\cdot|  is a semi-norm if and only if \cdot is semi-definite. 

Definitions

A bilinear form \cdot : V^2 \to \mathbb{R} is called

  • symmetric, if \forall x, y \in V: x \cdot y = y \cdot x,
  • positive-semi-definite, if \forall x \in V: x\cdot x \geq 0,
  • negative-semi-definite, if \forall x \in V: x \cdot x \leq 0,
  • semi-definite, if it is either positive-semi-definite or negative-semi-definite,
  • indefinite, if it is not semi-definite, and
  • fulfilling the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, if \forall x, y \in V: (x \cdot y)^2 \leq (x\cdot x)(y \cdot y).

A function f : V \to \mathbb{R} is called

  • positive-homogeneous, if \forall x \in V: \forall \alpha \in \mathbb{R}: f(\alpha x) = |\alpha| f(x),
  • fulfilling the triangle inequality, if \forall x, y \in V: f(x + y) \leq f(x) + f(y),
  • convex if \forall x, y \in V: \forall t \in [0, 1] \subset \mathbb{R}: f((1 - t)x + ty) \leq (1 - t)f(x) + tf(y), and
  • quasi-convex, if \forall x, y \in V: \forall t \in [0, 1] \subset \mathbb{R}: f((1 - t)x + ty) \leq \max\{f(x), f(y)\}.

Cauchy-Schwarz inequality is equivalent to semi-definiteness

Assume the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality holds but that \cdot is indefinite. Then there exists x, y \in V such that x \cdot x > 0 and y \cdot y < 0. Then (x \cdot y)^2 \leq (x \cdot x)(y \cdot y) does not hold since the left-hand side is non-negative and the right-hand side is negative. This is a contradiction. Therefore \cdot is semi-definite.

Assume \cdot is semi-definite. First, if y \cdot y = 0, then the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality holds trivially. Assume y \cdot y \neq 0. Decompose x as x = x_{\parallel} + x_{\perp}, where x_{\parallel} = \frac{x \cdot y}{y \cdot y} y is the orthogonal projection of x to y, and x_{\perp} = x - x_{\parallel} is the rejection of x from y. Then, by semi-definiteness, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality states that

|x_{\parallel} \cdot x_{\parallel }| \leq |x \cdot x|.

Again by semi-definiteness, and x_{\parallel} \cdot x_{\perp} = 0,

|x_{\parallel} \cdot x_{\parallel}| \leq |x_{\parallel} \cdot x_{\parallel } + 2 x_{\parallel} \cdot x_{\perp} + x_{\perp} \cdot x_{\perp}| = |x \cdot x|.

Therefore the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality holds. QED.

Convexity implies quasi-convexity

Let f : V \to \mathbb{R} be a convex function. Let x, y \in V, and t \in [0, 1] \subset \mathbb{R}. Now 

\begin{eqnarray} f((1 - t) x + tf(y)) & \leq & (1 - t)f(x) + tf(y) \\ {} & \leq & (1 - t) \max\{f(x), f(y)\} + t\max\{f(x), f(y)\}\\ {} & = & \max\{f(x), f(y)\}. \end{eqnarray}

Therefore f is quasi-convex. QED.

Quasi-convexity + non-negativity + positive-homogenuity implies triangle inequality

Let f : V \to \mathbb{R} be a non-negative quasi-convex positive-homogeneous function. For x, y \in V, let t = f(y) / (f(x) + f(y)). Now

\begin{eqnarray}f\left(\frac{x + y}{f(x) + f(y)}\right) & = & f\left((1 - t) \frac{x}{f(x)} + t\frac{y}{f(y)}\right) \\ {} & \leq & \max\left\{f\left(\frac{x}{f(x)}\right), f\left(\frac{y}{f(y)}\right)\right\} \\ {} & = & 1.\end{eqnarray}

Using positive-homogenuity and non-negativeness, 

f(x + y) \leq f(x) + f(y).

Therefore f fulfills the triangle inequality. QED.

For positive-homogeneous functions convexity and triangle inequality are equivalent

Let f : V \to \mathbb{R} be a positive-homogeneous function. Assume f is convex. Then f(x + y) = 2f(0.5 x + 0.5 y) \leq f(x) + f(y). Therefore f fulfills the triangle inequality. Assume f fulfills the triangle inequality. Let t \in [0, 1] \in \mathbb{R}. Then f((1 - t)x + ty) \leq f((1 - t)x) + f(ty) = (1 - t)f(x) + tf(y). Therefore f is convex. QED.

Semi-definiteness is equivalent to triangle inequality

Let \cdot : V^2 \to \mathbb{R} be a symmetric bilinear form, and |\cdot|: V \to \mathbb{R} : |x| = \sqrt{|x \cdot x|}.  Assume \cdot is indefinite. Then by indefiniteness there exists x, y \in V such that x \cdot x > 0 and y \cdot y < 0. Now one can solve the quadratic equation |(1 - t)x + ty| = 0 for t \in \mathbb{R}. The solution is

t = \frac{x \cdot (x + y) \pm \sqrt{(x \cdot y)^2 - (x \cdot x)(y \cdot y)}}{(x+y)\cdot(x+y)}.

The discriminant is always positive, since (x \cdot x)(y \cdot y) < 0. Therefore, there are two points a, b \in V, with |a| = 0 and |b| = 0, which lie on the same line as x and y. Either x or y is a convex combination of a and b. Without loss of generality, assume it is x. If |\cdot| were convex, it would hold that |x| = 0. Since this is not the case, |\cdot| is not convex and the triangle inequality does not hold.

Assume \cdot is semi-definite. Then the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality holds and (x \cdot x)(y \cdot y) \geq 0. Now,

\begin{eqnarray}|x+y|^2 & = & |(x + y) \cdot (x + y)| \\ {} & = & |x \cdot x + 2 x\cdot y + y\cdot y| \\ {} & \leq & |x \cdot x| + 2 |x\cdot y| + |y\cdot y| \\ {} & = & |x \cdot x| + 2 \sqrt{|x \cdot x|}\sqrt{|y \cdot y|} + |y \cdot y| \\ {} & = & (|x| + |y|)^2.\end{eqnarray}

Thus the triangle inequality holds. QED.

This entry was posted in Intuitive mathematics. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>